Saturday, May 31, 2008

Doctrinal Righteousness

“[Roman] Catholic righteousness by good works is vastly preferable to a Protestant righteousness by good doctrine. At least righteousness by good works benefits one’s neighbor, whereas righteousness by good doctrine only produces lovelessness and pride.”

- Herman Bavinck

Herman Bavinck is my favorite theologian. I think this is my new favorite quote.

Friday, May 30, 2008

The Dilemma of Belief in the World of Today

"Belief appears no longer as the bold but challenging leap out of the apparent all of our visible world and into the apparent void of the invisible and intangible; it looks much more like a demand to bind oneself to yesterday and to affirm it as eternally valid. "


- Pope Benedict XVI

This is is a great quote from a brilliant thinker as to why so many people today adopt a hermeneutics of suspicion. This is a difficult barrier for the minister of the gospel today.

Friday, May 9, 2008

What Hath Rome to do with Westminster?

"To be sure, the response of faith to revelation, which God grants to the creature he chooses and moves with his love, occurs in such a way that it is truly the creature that provides the response, with its own nature and its natural powers of love"

Hans Urs von Balthasar

This is a beautiful summation of the tension of God's initiating grace and our authentic response to the gospel from a brilliant Roman Catholic theologian.

Monday, May 5, 2008

your story

an open letter addressed to you

ruffled, broken, bent on the table

good news, bad news, you just don’t know

pregnant expectation attacks your stomach

the clock hand is now moving slowly


the paper in your hands is rough

the words are small

piercing your eyes with emotion

you taste excitement once again


paradise warped into wasteland

then stunned back into something beautiful

freedom strangled by the heat of idolatry

beauty, justice, relationships

the vandalization of shalom; the triumph of grace

from a garden-park to a holy city

This is your story

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Pneumatological Compassion and Mindfulness

Lately, I've been listening to podcasts of Krista Tippet's Speaking of Faith (American Public Media) on my iPod. This is a very stimulating and engaging forum of religious discussion. 

As a religious studies minor, and a lover of ideas, I want to stay in touch with all the "current" religious movements even after I leave the University. 

As an amateur follower of Francis Schaeffer, I really want to learn how to authentically listen to those of different faiths. As a Presbyterian, I am very good at destructing arguments and immediately pointing out when someone has gone theologically astray.  I do a poor job highlighting the beauty and truth (even if it is a partial truth) of other world religions. 

One of Krista's guests was Karen Armstrong. Armstrong considers herself a "freelance Monotheist". Armstrong is a Monotheist drawing from the various resources of Christianity, Islam and Judaism. When asked how these three religions could coexist, she pointed to the theological virtue of compassion. She believes that compassion is the one thread that runs through these three "historical" faiths that prohibits them from blowing each other apart. She concluded her interview by stating that compassion is the greatest of all religious impulses. 

Krista Tippet has also interviewed Thich Nhat Hanh.  Hanh is a world renowned Zen master. He has had a countless influence on many people (including Martin Luther King). For Hanh, the greatest religious impluse is "mindfulness". Mindfulness for Hanh is a calm and melodic "being in the moment". He believes that if different religious leaders would take the time to understand the sufferings of the "other" and practice mindfulness, we would see far more peace in the world. 

As a Christian, I believe compassion and mindfulness are indispensable. While I appreciate Armstrong's and Hanh's insights, I have to disagree with them on an important level. Throughout their entire conversations about compassion and mindfulness, they never mentioned God or even an "outside force" that could help cultivate compassion or mindfulness 
in human beings. This is really one of the reasons why I am a Christian. Most (if not all other religions) have beautiful ideals and ethical standards that I (on one level or another) am attracted to. My problem is that I can't muster enough will power or "calmness" to produce these religious impulses. 

My Christian faith stems from my desperateness and utter dependance. It is only in the Christian tradition that you have an outside personal force (the Holy Spirit) breeding these religious impulses in ones heart. I'm too anxious to be mindful . I'm too selfish to be compassionate. But I believe in a pneumatological mindfulness and compassion. It is the Holy Spirit that moves in us to cultivate a desire to sit still (mindfulness) and authentically listen to the "other" (compassion). I think this is why Christianity has never called these virtues impulses. They aren't a result of our spontaniety. Instead they are fruit. They can only grow when we are rooted in Christ and empowerd by his Spirit. 




 

Thursday, April 17, 2008

John Calvin's Central Soteriological Structure

What I am about to say will probably be controversial to some people.

John's Calvin's central soteriological structure is not the doctrine of predestination (as some critics of Calvin wrongly assume).

Lane Tipton, professor of systematic theology at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, writes:

"Calvin's central soteriological structure is Spirit wrought faith union with the crucified and resurrected Christ of Scripture"

Amen brother!

The Drama of Doctrine

I have a big problem. I try to read too many books at one time. My wife Kristen thinks I have an incurable disease :)

I also don't usually read through an entire book (I usually get through 1/2 or 3/4 of the way through). The major exception to this is when I read a book with someone else.

To my heart's delight, my friend/pastor (Brad Wright) and I will be reading through Kevin Vanhoozer's The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical-Linguistic Approach to Christian Theology.

The main argument of this book is that doctrines are not merely theoretical concepts that we are called to intellectually submit to. Instead, doctrines are the canonical-lingustic teachings about God's Trinitarian drama within redemptive history that serve to shape and guide the Christian's ecclesiastical/cultural performace.