Friday, March 28, 2008

The World is Not Flat: Challenging Globalization with a Eucharistic Imagination




I have been a corporate communications major for the past two years. One of the most popular "buzz" words in my field of study has been globalization. The concept globalization, like religion, is very difficult to define. Scholars have a hard time articulating exactly what globalization is.

Globalization (in its broadest sense) is the process whereby people and societies around the world are unified into a single "global village"; functioning together economically, politically and socially. Globalization seems to embody a certain degree of secular catholicity. For many corporate communication majors, globalization is the best thing since sliced bread. Organizations are able to host digital conference meetings in three different continents all at the same time. Many companies have pursued the economic advantages of globalization by "outsourcing" labor to various Eastern countries where the wage standards are minuscule. Popular American companies like McDonalds and Coca-Cola have planted colonies and promoted their products across the globe. Unlike any other moment in history, it appears that globalization is bringing the most cultures together and creating the greatest number of economic opportunities. Not to mention the fact that globalization has facilitated the movement from mass communication to massive communication (the capacity to effectively communicate with and influence very large populations around the world).

For the past four years, I have been a Christian theology major and a religious studies minor. You have no idea how excited I get when I come across an interdisciplinary academic study that addresses corporate communications issues with religious studies resources (or vice versa). The other day I came a across Catholic theologian William T. Cavanaugh's article The World in a Wafer: A Geography of the Eucharist as Resistance to Globalization. I know, what a mouthful! William T. Cavanaugh teaches systematic theology at St. Thomas University in St. Paul Minnesota and has authored Torture and Eucharist and The Theopolitical Imagination (a book I hope to buy and read very soon). My thoughts below are heavily influenced by Cavanaugh's stimulating article (found here: http://www.jesusradicals.com/library/cavanaugh/wafer.pdf)

Globalization, in the end, embodies a counterfeit catholicity. True catholicity is not just the "universal" overshadowing the "particular"- flattening out the uniqueness and locality of the particular, but the universal mysteriously present in the particular. Many people believe that globalization is such a great thing because it brings so many different people together. However, what many don't realize is that while globalization has a mighty reach, it is quite uncharitable. While globalization breaks through various cultures across the world, it ends up squashing the "uniqueness" and "otherness" of those cultures. Unity that leads to a forced, tasteless homogeneity is an ugly thing. Instead of bringing a variety of different cultures together, globalization is really creating an alternate mass-culture that slowly disintegrates the smaller cultures it comes in contact with.

Cavanaugh contrasts the false secular catholicity of globalization with the true catholicity the Eucharist. The church's practice of the Eucharist is truly catholic because it is a communal event that both cherishes particularity/locality (a particular loaf of bread and a very localized church comprised of very different members) and universality (Christ by his Hoy Spirit is cosmically present around the globe among his various churches and his saints are mysteriously united with one another).

"By the same liturgical action , not part but the whole Body of Christ is present in each local Eucharistic assembly. In Romans 16:23 Paul refers to the local community as hole he ekklesia, the whole Church. Indeed, in the first three centuries the term "catholic Church" is most commonly used to identify the local Church gathered around the Eucharist. Each particular church is not an administrative division of a larger whole, but is in itself a "concentration" of the whole. The whole Catholic Church is qualiatatively present in the local assembly, becuase the whole Body of Christ is present there. Catholic space, therefore, is not a simple, universal space uniting individuals directly to a whole; theEucharist refracts space in such a way that one becomes more united to the whole the more tied one becomes to the local. The true gloal village is not simply a village writ large, but rather "where two or three are gathered in my name" (Mt. 18:20)"

Globalization promises a unity without diversity-a homogenous vision without any subtstanital concrete plurality. The true catholic ekklesia, made up of males and females, rich and poor, white and black, is the only community that offers a rich unity without the obliteration of diversity.

Neither the Eucharist or globalization are neutral. They both demand our attention and vye to shape our imagination. Will you be shaped by the massive culture of globalization that forces you to downplay localized particulairty for a homogeneous universality or will you be interrupted by the Eucharist where you are fed the cosmic Christ who "appears in the homless person asking for a cup of coffee...who appears in the person of the weakest, those hungry or thirsty, strangers or naked, sick or imprisoned (Mt.25-46)" ?

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

How to Avoid Not Speaking about God



The existence of evil has been a problem for Christians since the early church. Many scientists have rejected the Christian view of creation and divine providence because of the supposed evidence for evolutionary naturalism. Philosophers have often abandoned an orthodox understanding of God (or have radically redefined the concept "God") due to alleged inner-contradictions within the traditional understanding of God (e.g., how can God be an eternal being and yet be simultaneously involved in a time-bound world?).

In the last 50 (or so years) a new weapon has been aimed at God and theological discourse in particular. Various philosophers (usually operating within the framework of hard postmodernism) have posed the following dilemma:

(i) God is infinite
(ii) Human language is necessarily finite
(iii)Therefore, any "God-talk" will either obliterate God's otherness or be de facto unintelligible

How can nouns, verbs, and adjectives (etc) possibly describe a being that is infinite? The moment one"captures" God within the net of a theological statement- he ceases to be God. Stripped of his transcendence, he becomes another finite "idea" or "thought" that can be described and analyzed.

If these allegations are true, they pose a major threat for Christian theology. How as Christians do we avoid nor speaking about God?

Paradoxically,we avoid not speaking about God by looking at the heart of our theology: the incarnation. In the incarnation we discover a particular logic at work. In the person of Jesus, the eternal, infinite God is pleased to dwell and embody himself in human form. Jesus is not half God and half man, he is fully God and fully human. The logic embodied in the incarnation is that infinity can take on the finite (and vice versa) without collapsing into meaninglessness.

The application to theological discourse should be obvious. Although God can never be "captured" by theological concepts, within the logic of the incarnation, finite words are able to communicate meaningful and true things about God. Finite language, while never escaping its finiteness- just like Jesus' humanity never escaped its humanness- can never the less be an adequate vehicle to describe an infinite God.

Philosopher James K.A. Smith writes:

"It is in this way that language functions like the Incarnation of the God-man: when the "Word became flesh" (John 1:14), the transcendent God descended into the realm of immanence (finitude), but without thereby denying or giving up his transcendence... God's transcendence is inaccessible to us, but the way in which this is remedied is precisely by God's humiliation and descent to the order of the (fallen) creature. It is God who moves toward finitude, rather than lifting up ...the finite.

(Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of the Incarnation, page 25).

It was God's powerful initiative love that led him to humble himself and take the form of a servant. As Christians (although always being careful of not being overly dogmatic) this should encourage us that God has not only made it possible for us to communicate about him and his gospel- he desires that we do so.